What do I mean by “Reading Journal”?
It’s the notebook I carry around when I read. I keep track of every book, noting sentences/paragraphs that catch my attention. There are several ways a passage can do this:
1) Fantastic writing; I like the sentiment expressed
2) Poor writing
3) A word or reference I’m not familiar with
4) Plot/continuity error
5) General confusion
In Reading Journal entries on this blog, I introduce the book, give a short plot description/overview (with rating), then share passages with comments explaining why they caught my attention. Quotes directly from the book are in this color. (If I share a passage without any comment, that means I think it’s great and I simply want you to have the joy of reading it.)
When giving Vocabulary definitions, I use Google results (and I believe Google uses the Oxford Pocket English Dictionary). When explaining References, I use Wikipedia unless otherwise noted; in those cases I link to the site.
YOUR ONE AND ONLY SPOILER WARNING: I don’t go out of my way to reveal plot points but I don’t go out of my way to avoid them, either. If a scene I want to discuss happens to contain the death of a main character, it will be part of my post. If you’re interested in reading one of these books and don’t want the plot revealed, stop reading once I start quoting from the book.
LANGUAGE WARNING: I will never censor a book. I will use the exact language of the author when quoting their work. I also toss in light curses in reviews, though I try not to go full-tilt. In any case, the subject matter will occasionally tread toward R territory (and usually hovers around PG-13). I will not give warnings in specific reviews.
RATING SYSTEM: I rate on a 5-star scale (half stars included). My thought process at each star:
1 star: I couldn’t finish the book because of poor writing and/or disinterest in plot. If I did get through the whole thing, it took effort. I would actively talk people out of reading it.
2 stars: Some essential balance of elements was off; often a well-written book with a boring or confusing plot. I finish it feeling that my time was wasted. Would not recommend.
3 stars: Probably won’t read again but my time wasn’t wasted. Good/competent on most marks (though poorly-written books with entertaining plots can grab a 3). Recommendation comes with conditions (“Only read if…”).
4 stars: Above average quality of writing and above average plot/execution. Recommended. Would read again. Will add the author to reading rotation.
5 stars: High quality of writing. Amazing plot/execution. The kind of book I want to own and will push on people. Will actively seek out other books by the author as soon as possible.
I use the same guidelines on Goodreads (though they don’t allow half-star ratings). To give an idea of how my ratings balance out, of the books I read through the years 2015-2017:
7% rated at 1 star
30% rated at 2 stars
30% rated at 3 stars
26% rated at 4 stars
7% rated at 5 stars
Back to the show!